December 23rd 2012 a New York Newspaper Printed the names and addresses of every Licensed Pistol Permit holder in two Counties and another County is being posted shortly! This is a massive privacy breach and the latest in a series of over the top emotional reactions to the latest shooting tragedy in Sandy Hook CT meant to intimidate the lawful and prey on peoples fears to exploit the gun grabbing agenda.
In an article title “The gun owner next door: What you don’t know about the weapons in your neighborhood” the paper linked to an interactive map titled: “Map: Where are the gun permits in your neighborhood?” where you can search neighborhoods to see who received a legal permit to own a hand gun license listed by name and address.
Some Immediate Reaction to this invasion of privacy:
“The gun -owner has an added responsibility to take all measures that their firearms do not fall into the hands of such miscreants. Beside the natural precautions, they cannot permit themselves to fall hostage in trade for access to their firearms locks.”
” If the homeowner is killed or injured, will LOHUD be charged as an accomplice to the crime?”
“It is as if they put out an ad to jewel thieves listing the names and addresses of where to find diamonds and cash.”
“This is CRAZY!! why in the world would you post every licensed gun owner information?? What do you hope to accomplish by doing this? This is the type of thing you do for sex offenders not law abiding gun owners. What next? should I hang a flag outside my house that says I own a gun?”
“Now everyone knows where the LEGAL GUNS are kept, a valuable piece of information for criminals. Why don’t you do something helpful, like trying to find out where the ILLEGAL GUNS are kept? That would be helpful to the non-criminal population”
Threats from local Government:
The New York Times Reported last week that Governor Cuomo of New York said:
“Confiscation could be an option. Mandatory sale to the state could be an option. Permitting could be an option — keep your gun but permit it,”
New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg had this to say about banning rifles:
“The president, through his leadership, could get a Bill like that (banning assault weapons) through Congress… That’s his job,” Bloomberg said.
This is a invasion of privacy that does nothing to safeguard the law abiding from the criminal element. One barking dog can herd a thousand sheep to be sheared. This appears to be an attempt to abrogate the Bill of Rights. If Paul Revere had the internet, he would not have needed a horse. Please share this with all of your fellow Americans who are alarmed by a government encroachment, aided and abetted by propagandist masquerading as objective journalist.
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH! If you are appalled and alarmed at this abuse of power:
The best response to the gun grabbing agenda driven is for Americans nation-wide to purchase a firearm today!
I am calling on all Americans, Constitutionalists, Tea Party Patriots and 2nd Amendment Activists, to make their voices heard in NY and around the country immediately. The New York City Council just published a report recommending blatant infringements and restraints on the Bill of Rights!!
Contact the Editors at LOHUD.COM and cancel your subscription and let their advertisers know how you feel about it. This is the power of the 1st Amendment in your hands that empowers you to preserve the safeguard afforded us by the 2nd Amendment to the Bill of Rights.
Please Like us on Facebook to stay updated on this issue:
RALLY FOR PRIVACY & GUN RIGHTS
BEING PLANNED BY:
“I AM THE TEA PARTY!”
PLEASE INVITE PEOPLE ASAP!
MOSSBERG 500 TACTICAL CRUISER, 12G, 18″
ARMA LITE AR-10
4 Channel – Camera with 10″ Tablet DVR system
HOWA/KNOXX M-1500 Axiom .223 Rifle 
If this is not public records, there should be a MASSIVE lawsuit in order.
Responsible juneralism would have never published this information…and a responsible city government would nave made sure it was not leaked….even if it is a public record…just saying…now many people will be targeted for their guns…and some will die trying to take them and some will die trying to defend their ownership. More blood on the hands of libs
actually the opposite is true, you have now given a roadmap to the criminals stalking a home … all they need to do is pull up, check the address for gun ownership, and voila
This is along my thoughts too…a would be burglar, raper, etc. can now check to see which home is armed before proceeding.
They can also find where they can possibly find guns for their criminal use. a very STUPID movo on the part of the city and paper.
Tom Driscoll Sr. Stephanie Bray • in a few seconds
−
They can also find where they can possibly find guns for their criminal use. a very STUPID move on the part of the city and paper.
And if they are looking to steal one, they know where they can find it.
Ths problem is MUCH MUCH bigger than the gun owners. Now all the OTHER addresses are confirmed “gun free”……which houses will be invaded first now?
Responsible Journalism? Does that even exist any more more like paid propaganda
Amen!!! I seriously feel like this is something that would have happened in Germany under Hitler’s dictatorship…and I know I’ll get attacked for saying it, but it’s the God’s honest truth and only those who can see past the media and have minds of their own will get it!
Katy, I agree with You to the extreme This move shows the danger posed by the re-election of that muzzie donkey by a bunch of ignorant MORONS.
The Boston Globe tried to do this a few years ago but the courts shut them down,
it shouldn’t be public records if it is.. criminals would love to look this stuff up before robbing places. Hmm lets see who doesn’t have a gun and this paper just showed those criminals who to avoid.
Payback, post the names of all the people who drove drunk and killed someone! Make sure their address is listed especially if they are a repeat offender. That’s on the premise that they survived too! Where I live, I can point out four that have killed with their car. No jail.
say publish the list of each and every employee within lohud that has a gun permit……..
Also the name and address of those who DON’T
Post, highlight and emphasize any who are politicians especially. Or unethical journalists, as in this case.
Payback would be going after the reporter and editor of the paper you idiot.
There is actually a posting on facebook already with the names,addresses and phone numbers of those at the paper that were involved in posting the article.You just have to look for it. I have posted on my homepage as well!!!!!!!
You’re a fool if you think this will hurt gun owners……it is all those other addresses that are now CONFIRMED gun free….THOSE homeowners will be hurt by this most!
i agree with you, if i was a non-gun owner i would be worried
They can also find where they can possibly find guns for their criminal use. a very STUPID move on the part of the city and paper.. Look in the mirror for the FOOL.
I feel that the posting could also have a backlash against the gunowners as well.Such as which houses have the guns that the criminal wants.What are these gunowners going to do with their guns while they are at work or even on vacation?You can’t always take your guns with you.The same could be said about other possesions you own as well.Such as jewelry,money and t.v.s. I just wonder if the The Journal News is going to take responsibility as wel,l for any actions that may have been caused by posting the article.Such as a burgalry going bad at not just the non gunowners homes but also the gunowners homes.
BETTER STILL post the records, of any kind,, of the politicians and others responsible for this dumb move.
Its public because its on the internet….
Darren: FYI: It was not published on the internet. The LOHUD.COM editors requested a freedom of information release from the county clerk. Then the newspaper published it on the internet.
no it is not on the internet, it is now, but that information is private …..
[...] BREAKING – EXCLUSIVE: NY Paper Publishes Legal Gun Permit Holders Names in Print & Online! Now publishing pistol permit holders addresses. Anyone think Civil War is coming? How much can we take? Reply With Quote [...]
What are you doing, you are endangering lives and property by doing this release of information…. your foolishness is ironic in many respects, really stupid in ALL respects!!!! JG – Texas Molon Labe!
John: I agree. This is out there already. I am alerting you all to it.
FYI: It was not on the internet. The LOHUD.COM editors filed a freedom of information request with the County Clerk. Then the newspaper published it on the internet.
[...] the first amendment rights to try and kill the second is there new idea, it was a really bad one! http://amiglobalsecurity.com/breaking-ny-paper-publishes-gun-permit-holders-names-in-print-online/ [...]
This is why Registration is a bad thing. The news paper just announced where criminals can find gun when the owner of the house is not home. They make you registar cars so they can claim it as a privlege and take it away at will. If the news papers can track gun owners then the registration needs to be stopped. They just made gun owners targets for assassination. First we have a texas politition calling for the killing of gun owners on twitter, and one week later we have a news paper printing where their houses are. Talk about a major breach of privacy.
Yes – registration is good on the front end, bad on the back end. If government decides to turn on its people through martial law, then they know where to get the guns. The use of this in the original “Red Dawn” also rings true, where an invading military can seize the records of the overthrown municipal office and find the citizens that are armed – to make sure they aren’t a “problem”. A little imagination also says that if the guns aren’t there, then all they have to do is track the family “records” on file to get leverage against those with the guns.
[...] know it's public record – but this is bad. Really bad. BREAKING – EXCLUSIVE: NY Paper Publishes Legal Gun Permit Holders Names in Print & Online! http://www.lohud.com/interactive/art…nclick_check=1 I am George Zimmerman… I am [...]
[...] Newspaper Printed the names and addresses of every Licensed Pistol Permit holder in two Counties BREAKING – EXCLUSIVE: NY Paper Publishes Legal Gun Permit Holders Names in Print & Online! [...]
So the newspaper has essentially painted a target on every non-gun-owning household, which says, “Come Rob Us, My family and I do not own a gun.” “We live in a gun-free zone.”
I’d say this newspaper will be sued by both parties, every which way but Sunday.
…and the bell cannot be unrung.
PUT Them right OUT of BUSINESS.
This is not public record, it is actually private since the applications and approvals contain personal information such as date of birth, social security numbers, etc. This is a privacy breach and I hope every person on this list and in he upcoming list, sue this New York newspaper for breaching their privacy and possibly putting their lives in danger. There is a reason it is called “CONCEALED”, dumb asses, so people do not know that you are carrying a gun or not. Listing the names of people who have a gun permit puts these license holders’ lives in danger, because if someone decides to break in their house, the criminal will know to expect that the person has a gun, thus putting their lives in danger.
imagine this map, but on a national level. good luck trying to confiscate every single one of those. I’m betting there would be thousands of incidents of gun owners refusing to give up their firearms resulting in deaths on both the civilian and gov side.
I guarantee that the person behind what this newspaper did has a last name of Levi, Goldstein, Goldberg, Solomon, Freidman, Levine, or Schwartz.
Sounds like a law firm.
This is the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard. All this is doing is letting people that are capable of these mass shootings, know where they can get guns. They should be ashamed. If something happens in these areas, the blood should be on their hands for releasing this info
Faster and Furiouser.
The cruel joke is on the defenseless families. Burglars and rapists now know where you are.
Lohud.com is owned by BANK OF AMERICA ……..
http://www.whois.com/whois/lohud.com
really, isnt that same one who loaned obama money for his re election & then went bankrupt?
BOA IS OWNED BY CHINESE. CHINESE WANT US DISARMED SO THEY CAN INVADE US THREW THE U.N. .. NOT HARD TO SEE THEIR MOTIVE. THIS ARTICLE IS A CRIME!!!!! YOU HAVE JUST TOLE EVERY FREAK-CRIMINAL WHO DON’T HAVE GUNS!!!!! FUQINRETARDS~
BofA is owned by the Rothschilds. All large banks can all trace current full or half ownership to the Rothschilds. This includes the entire Federal Reserve System…
Now burglars know where to break-in and rob and not get shot.
I think it is great, now the crooks know who to rob as they dont have to worry about being shot….these people are really stupid, go crooks
Someone needs to bring a lawsuit against this paper, People NEED TO SPEAK UP! CALL OR WRITE YOUR REPRESENTATIVES – GET THE WORD OUT! READ MY LIPS, NO MORE GUN CONTROL!
Go over to that newspaper, write them a letter, SHAME THEM IN PUBLIC all over this nation! The more people who know these Lib Freaks are trampling over the right to privacy the better! Make lohud.com/
the most reviled paper in this country!
interesting
so.. criminals now know where NOT to do crime.. all other homes and
business are now OPEN SEASON on the sheeple.. Marry Crimemas.. to the
criminals… (just avoid those on the list to live) oh and now anyone
who want to Steal guns…has a shopping list as well. And the Anti
American progressive thugs have a list to go attack people over the
issue since they are so full of hate… personally since this puts at
risk REAL risk life and liberty, those on the list should SUE SUE the NY
Paper for doing this. I bet if you put the newspapers personal info in
print to everyone, some would be upset…
[...] Damn. I am glad I do not live in New York and I am thinking someone is going to pay before the lawyers finish..Ever hear of PRIVACY!!! [...]
When did exercising one’s Constitutional right to keep and bear arms become a crime, or even an inappropriate activity? This newspaper needs to be sued clear out of business. No class action, THOUSANDS of individual suits. They’ll be gone before Easter.
These bassturds need to be focusing on the thousands of criminals who own guns and use them for the purpose of robbing or killing others. This is Bullshiite.
It’s obvious that both the State of New York, not to mention the New York Times have now placed themselves in a major liability problem. That Permit information is privileged & subject to the Privacy Act. In releasing that information both the New York Times & the State of New York have violated the Law. So much for “Obeying The Law.” Just like David Gregory violated Federal Law by bringing a M-16 20-round magazine into Washington D.C. & showing it on “Meet The Press” last Sunday. “On The Air.”
Why do people continue to live in these idiotic states? New York obviously doesn’t respect their citizen’s privacy or rights. I would leave at my first opportunity! There are jobs in free states…
More liberal media pushing the government’s anti-gun agenda for them.
This shit must stop.
Its a violation of the information act., Hatch Act and many others. The press has started to go overboard with the freedom of press issue. The paper should be legally and financially responsible for anything that happens to any of the homes or people listed. Sorry but this does not fall under your rights you slimy newspaper.
As a gun owner I feel demonized for exercising my second amendment rights, almost like a sex offender.
Never in my lifetime did I think I’d see something like this happen in America. How many service men and women have fought for our freedom, and how many have paid the ultimate price with their very lives, just to see us throw it away? It is NOT acceptable journalism to publish private names and addresses of firearm owners. These are respectable citizens who have passed extensive security screening in order to have the right to own firearms for self-protection. This is wonderful information for criminals by the way…both for where to find guns (who not to attack when someone is home, where to break in if it looks vacant) but also for potential easy marks (no registered guns). But to just hand over our rights and expect big brother government to take care of us? Yeah, that’s worked out really well for other peoples and countries, hasn’t it? We were a great nation. But we’re allowing it to be taken away. Welcome to the new America. I hope we survive it.
I feel very much the same way. It’s been VERY hard for me to get into the Christmas Spirit this year because I’m fearful of what the future has in store for this Country and my children….I ask my husband what are we going to do when shit hits the fan here…and as a servicemember, I most likely would have to leave him behind…which I would not want to do….I wish things would change but let’s face it they’re not going to….
[...] the Gov't has your info. Crap like this happens. BREAKING – EXCLUSIVE: NY Paper Publishes Legal Gun Permit Holders Names in Print & Online! __________________ Writer of [...]
boycott them and let their sponsor know…tie up their BUSINESS/PHONE LINES with any damn excuse for an explanation…yes, physical presence and disgust is what makes news…the left thinks the Right is unabole to protest or to organize…
ARE YOU IRRESPONSIBLE JOURNALISTS EFFIN NUTS??? I HOPE YOU ARE SUED AFTER IT IS CONFIRMED A THIEF BROKE INTO A HOME TO GET THESE WEAPONS AND USED THEM TO SHOOT AND KILL A HOMEOWNER IN A NONE GUN HOME!!!
YOU ARE PART OF THE PROBLEM BY DOING THIS!!!!
The entire editorial staff needs to go to prison for violating the privacy act of 1974. Yes it applies to this.
Well now the criminals know where they DONT have to worry. Conversely to be fair how about a list of those that dont listed by street just to make it easier for them to look it up.
Then when they institute that worthless gun buy-back program the bad guys will have a map tp know where to steal them..idiots…someone should hand New York thier backside in the form of a huge settlement..
The point is really moot. The newspaper is irresponsible and ineffective. In NYS one only registers handguns, not rifles and shotguns. The only thing people can see is who owns handguns. The list does not report who owns shotguns, which are far more effective against home invasion. That is the problem with the whole gun debate, non-gunners know very little about guns or about gun laws, so they are easy to manipulated by irresponsible news reporters and politicians. When people actually learn the facts, they stop being anti-gunners.
Well when you think about it, nobody wil mess with these people knowing they are armed. I think they may have a law suit on their hands..
[...] New York Paper Publishes Legal Gun Permit Holders Names and Addresses on line. http://www.lohud.com/interactive/art…nclick_check=1 http://amiglobalsecurity.com/breakin…-print-online/ [...]
This is not from a legitimate news organization but a political activist group under the guise of a news service. These permits are not public access information but contain personal, private information provided to the government. I personally don’t care if you know I have a gun permit but now in an attempt to push a misguided gun control agenda they have endangered the lives of people who don’t have gun permits by showing the criminal his best options for success with no danger to himself. I see huge opportunities for massive lawsuits and a chance to close down a destructive, oppressive socialistic activist group. Sue hell out of em.
Lohud is looking to cause blood to flow in the streets. Tragedy sells as news.
Never let a good crisis go to waste; if there is none, create one.
They dd this once before, this is a cheap rerun of an earlier attempt to disarm Westchester. County, NY.
Growing up in the area that this paper is all I can say is I always refereed to this paper as the Journal Joke.
I will from now until forever boycott these brands: http://www.gannett.com/section/BRANDS&template=cover
If this country where a home, New York would be the septic tank !
If I were a criminal, I’d be thrilled to see the homes that weren’t listed as having guns. If this becomes common practice, I think everyone should get a gun permit even if they don’t want a gun.
[...] easier to take the guns when you know where they are. AMI Global Security [...]
We live in a strange world where government collects and reports on us. This very well may be considered public information (with some data redacted like birth dates, SS numbers, etc.) Another example is political donations. Our crazy laws require your name, address, and political donations to be made publicly available. I do work for a political party and am required to snitch on all of our supporters. Your employer can decide to lookup what political organizations you support or don’t support and treat you differently based on whether or not he/she agrees with you.
[...] Read more at AMI Global Security [...]
people subscribe to them….who knows if i was burglar & knew this house had guns & this one didn’t I would sure rob one that didn’t.
That news source should be ashamed for making that map,on the other hand those are the people I feel safest to be around ,licenced gun owners represent the lowest crime rate in america ..PRO 2A
This is a blaintant violation of privacy rules.
The New York Times has proven once again that it is not the great paper of past. This practice of yellow Jurnalism will back fire. Not only on His Majesty Bloomberg, but send ripples through the country. I’m sure that there thoses who think that this just saved lives. Be rest assured the only thing it has saved is time for the criminal.
The question on your mind is how was this information gotten? This is like a drivers licence as far as security. The only people that have this info is NICS and that is only for 6 months, the police they have this info only when your DL is typed in to the system, it’s for their safety, and the Feds.
Was it hacked? Was it paid for? I challenge the local government and the state to investigate.
This is the begining of a storm that we as Americans need to quell before it gets to the point of a huricane.
Now the would be robbers know the safe houses to attack. Yeah, good job LOHUD.
These gun owners now have no choice but to remain constantly armed and prepared. A sad development for those that simply acquired permits for collections and sport. They will not only be faced with potential threats from the criminal element, but also from the more radical elements from the leftist side of the political spectrum.
This is ridiculous not only have they identified where a weapon can be found but they identified who’s homes are unprotected.
Now the criminals know who doesn’t have a gun and can rob the neighbor next door. Hahahahah! This will backfire. If it happens in my neck of the woods… I will not only have a handgun locked up in my house.. they can publish that I am now locked and loaded and ready to fire. I usually keep them in the safe. What idiots. The mainstream media and Washington are fueling the fires for a civil war. They’ll get it too because if I’m defending my rights as a human being, it’s not murder and I can live with that. Thanks for making me cuss on Christmas Eve you shitheads!
I’d be more worried for the safety of the guy who’s name IS NOT on the list. When shopping around for a home to rob, who do you idiots think is going to be higher on the criminals list? The home owner who is equipped and might shoot me, or the guy who I know has no way to stop me from raping, killing, or robbing him?
NY has just published an “available unarmed victims” list.
STUPID was 1st thing to come to mind. Nothing like making 2 counties open the the nasty people who got their guns illegally. I feel for the people who are not pointed out as gun owners, now called sitting ducks, and the gun owners as well as they can be targeted and robbed for their gun(s). Wonder whos stupid idea this was. Liberal or not, they didnt give it much thought. I am also sure they dont live in those counties either. Shame, they cant retract whats already out their. Wow that paper isnt very American!
What is the name of this newspaper ?
[...] Global Security, which published an article condemning the “massive privacy breach” that is “meant to intimidate the lawful” and [...]
[...] they know where you live…. BREAKING – EXCLUSIVE: NY Paper Publishes Legal Gun Permit Holders Names in Print & Online! [...]
post all owners and editors of every major newspaper especially those who sold us into two unending war and let the real american people get them.
I disagree. Publish just one name, the editor and chief of the IOHUD. Publishing one name is much more effective than publishing hundreds.
They need to file a life changing lawsuit upon the person that did that.
Kinda seems like the “brown shirts” are here…
Think of the unintended consequences… when criminals use this data to begin targeting “low gun density areas”, then the people living in those areas will begin buying firearms, and so-forth and so on. The backlash in new gun sales is 180 degrees from the original intention.
[...] December 23rd 2012 a New York Newspaper Printed the names and addresses of every Licensed Pistol Permit holder in two Countiesand another County is being posted shortly! This is a massive privacy breach and the latest in a series of over the top emotional reactions to the latest shooting tragedy in Sandy Hook CT meant to intimidate the lawful and prey on peoples fears to exploit the gun grabbing agenda.In an article title “The gun owner next door: What you don’t know about the weapons in your neighborhood” the paper linked to an interactive map titled: “Map: Where are the gun permits in your neighborhood?” where you can search neighborhoods to see who received a legal permit to own a hand gun license listed by name and address.Threats from local Government:The New York Times Reported last week that Governor Cuomo of New York said: “Confiscation could be an option. Mandatory sale to the state could be an option. Permitting could be an option — keep your gun but permit it,”New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg had this to say about banning rifles: “The president, through his leadership, could get a Bill like that (banning assault weapons) through Congress… That’s his job,” Bloomberg said.This is a invasion of privacy that does nothing to safeguard the law abiding from the criminal element. One barking dog can herd a thousand sheep to be sheared. This appears to be an attempt to abrogate the Bill of Rights. If Paul Revere had the internet, he would not have needed a horse. Please share this with all of your fellow Americans who are alarmed by a government encroachment, aided and abetted by propagandist masquerading as objective journalist.ENOUGH IS ENOUGH! If you are appalled and alarmed at this abuse of power:The best response to the gun grabbing agenda driven is for Americans nation-wide to purchase a firearm today!I am calling on all Americans, Constitutionalists, Tea Party Patriots and 2nd Amendment Activists, to make their voices heard in NY and around the country immediately. The New York City Council just published a report recommending blatant infringements and restraints on the Bill of Rights!!Contact the Editors at LOHUD.COM and cancel your subscription and let their advertisers know how you feel about it. This is the power of the 1st Amendment in your hands that empowers you to preserve the safeguard afforded us by the 2nd Amendment to the Bill of Rights. [...]
[...] Troy Forbus • 14 hours ago [...]
This is intimidation, at its best.
Not only does it ring of a ‘big brother’ quality watchlist, but it advertises to criminals which homes can be robbed should they want to steal a firearm for use in OTHER crimes. Wait until the owner leaves, break in and BAM, now the bad guy has the gun and the home owner loses his property. Two birds, one stone. Guns stay scary, criminal things, and law abiding citizens are disarmed. GENIUS!
Compare the concealed density and crimes for corresponding areas
http://www.neighborhoodscout.com/ny/crime/
The great thing about this is that it can prove the point of those who believe in the 2nd amendment and the US constitution. A criminal with any sense up there will case the house then go see if a permit exists for it. If not, they can break into it with impunity. If it does they can move to the next one. Genius
Now the neighbors who don’t own a gun may be a easier target for robbers and criminals…. just avoid the house with the legal gun permit , the criminals should send the paper a commission….
who gave the newspapers the info ???? Would that be the Police Dept???
There are only four things wrong with that map, 1 it exists. 2, 3, and 4, it is missing the names and addresses of the author, editor, and publisher of that rag, and whether or not their own houses are gun-free-zones. This paper appears to be begging for a class-action lawsuit.
LOHUD.com is a Gannet company, so I would extend all scrutiny of advertisers to advertisers in any Gannett publication, a major one being USA Today.
If an online shaming hit-list is okay for ex-sex offenders, then I am all for this. In fact, we should put all criminals / sinners on an online hit-list stomping on their privacy rights and potentially putting them and their families in danger.
http://sexoffenderissues.blogspot.com/2010/03/hey-politicians-why-are-you-wasting-all.html
If an online shaming hit-list is okay for ex-sex offenders, then I am all for this. In fact, we should put all criminals / sinners on an online hit-list stomping on their privacy rights and potentially putting them and their families in danger. . .
http://sexoffenderissues.blogspot.com/2010/03/hey-politicians-why-are-you-wasting-all.html
I have a perfect idea: lets take the thought an earlier poster had: publish the same personal info on every newspaper PUBLISHER and expand it to every journalist in the New York area ALONG WITH an indication about whether or not that person has a gun permit.
publishing this just put all the non gun owners in precarious positions…..they are the gun free zone. how irresponsible.
[...] Global Security, which published an article condemning the “massive privacy breach” that is “meant to intimidate the lawful” and “abrogate the [...]
Bitching and complaining not gonna do any good.. the kibg and his jesters have decided the 2nd admendment is irrelevant.
this is disgusting! The media is ruthless and just wants the masses to believe and swing in the direction that themselves and the government thinks people should go….dare I say that I feel like sooner rather than later we shall be living in a Socialist country??? This saddens me a great deal as I LOVE my country and what it was founded on!
[...] AMI Global Security – by Tony Mele [...]
wow….ya had me, just a click away…..til I saw “I AM THE TEA PARTY!”
so..now the criminals know which house to rob…they just check the list to make sure an address is not on it…smart…real smart…watch the crime rate go up..betcha money it does..
Just start publishing home and office addresses of journalists and politicians.
[...] a newspaper does this, essentially telling every criminal out there who is a legal gun-holder, they have essentially, and in my opinion criminally, endangered every other household in that [...]
This is outrageous whatever this paper is it should be put out of business and lawsuits should be flying this is a direct violation of your civil rights and this paper should be boycotted and bankrupted !
,Who’s freakin abortion is this this is disgusting ,Just glad where I live registration is not mandatory ,I feel sorry for all you assholes who allow this to stand ! I’d be contacting my lawyer immediately
Good anti theft protection for the gun owner, bad for the non gun owner. Now the thieves know which houses are safe to enter.
[...] http://amiglobalsecurity.com/breaking-ny-paper-publishes-gun-permit-holders-names-in-print-online/ [...]
Zionist Jews own NY Times. This is just another facet of their centuries old treachery. They did 911. They were involved in Sandy Hook massacre.
Genocide Advocated by the Talmud
Minor Tractates. Soferim 15, Rule 10. This is the saying of Rabbi Simon
ben Yohai: Tob shebe goyyim harog (“Even the best of the gentiles
should all be killed”).
This passage is from the original Hebrew of the Babylonian Talmud as
quoted by the 1907 Jewish Encyclopedia, published by Funk and Wagnalls
and compiled by Isidore Singer, under the entry, “Gentile,” (p.
617).
This original Talmud passage has been concealed in translation. The Jewish
Encyclopedia states that, “…in the various versions the reading
has been altered, ‘The best among the Egyptians’ being generally substituted.”
In the Soncino version: “the best of the heathens” (Minor Tractates,
Soferim 41a-b].
Israelis annually take part in a national pilgrimage to the grave of
Simon ben Yohai, to honor this rabbi who advocated the extermination of
non-Jews. (Jewish Press, June 9, 1989, p. 56B).
On Purim, Feb. 25, 1994, Israeli army officer Baruch Goldstein, an orthodox
Jew from Brooklyn, massacred 40 Palestinian civilians, including children,
while they knelt in prayer in a mosque. Goldstein was a disciple of the
late Brooklyn Rabbi Meir Kahane, who told CBS News that his teaching that
Arabs are “dogs” is derived “from the Talmud.” (CBS
60 Minutes, “Kahane”).
University of Jerusalem Prof. Ehud Sprinzak described Kahane and Goldstein’s
philosophy: “They believe it’s God’s will that they commit violence
against goyim, a Hebrew term for non-Jews.” (NY Daily News,
Feb. 26, 1994, p. 5).
Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg declared, “We have to recognize that Jewish
blood and the blood of a goy are not the same thing.” (NY
Times, June 6, 1989, p.5).
Rabbi Yaacov Perrin said, “One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish
fingernail.” (NY Daily News, Feb. 28, 1994, p.6).
Any Conservitives or other freedom loving people in New York, Arizona won’t do that to you. Or. you can move to Maryland. We need to make it a truly Free State.
[...] Read More At AMI Global Security [...]
[...] the tragedy of Newtown to do what “Fast & Furious” failed to provide them with: an opportunity to shit all over the second amendment. The left’s idiotic and totally emotional and hypocritical argument, repeated ad nauseum, is [...]
First off I don’t live in New York and they’d best thank God I don’t, or I would be owning a newspaper and firing a few people! Secondly, you idiots want my guns? Come on to Indiana and TAKE THEM I DARE YOU!
wow, it looks like we are heading for another revolution
on the flip side is criminals know which houses do NOT have guns, so those people will be easy pickings for home invasion or robbery. I bet the knee jerk Liberals did not think of that one.
I THINK THIS IS A BAD HOAX!!! LOOK AT THE MAPS CLOSELY… IF I WERE IN A HOUSE THEIR MAP POINTS TO I WOULD SUE THEIR ASSES OFF!
http://www.lohud.com/interactive/article/20121223/NEWS01/121221011/Map-Where-gun-permits-your-neighborhood
THEY HAVE EDUCATED EERY FREAK-CRIMINAL WHO DOES NOT HAVE GUNS! SOMEONE SUE THESES RETARDS FOR RECKLESS ENDANGERMENT!!!
[...] post at AIM Global Security called the article an “invasion of privacy that does nothing to safeguard the law abiding [...]
The only real reason the newspaper would do that is to incite some crazy to assault the gun owners or to hold mass demonstrations outside his house. Sounds like grounds for a massive class action suit.
The anti gun forces are nearly as demonic as the shooters.
I thought everyone had a gun there is people who don’t?
Clearly criminal actions, and the news parer personnel should be tried and convicted.
I can see the criminals robbing the homes and stealing the weapons. Dumb move to post the addresses.
Where were you when a local paper published thousands of peoples info in central IA, just like this? Oh yeah, the left wasn’t threatening a gun grab then, so you couldn’t politicize it. Left and right are both savage opportunists, feeding on Americans, destroying our freedoms, and stealing our wealth.
Umm..my grandmother had a rifle and hand gun and never went crazy and shot up massive crowds of people…I feel like people who are gun owners shouldnt have to give up their guns. Thats crazy..Police aint always available when you need them. WHat are we suppose to do out here? Its becoming the Wild Wild West…
[...] Global Security, which published an article condemning the “massive privacy breach” that is “meant to intimidate the lawful” and “abrogate the [...]
[...] easier to take the guns when you know where they are. AMI Global Security [...]
1911 – Turkey disarmed its citizens, and between 1915 – 1917 they murdered 1.5 million Armenians.
1929 – Russia disarmed its citizens, and between 1929 – 1953 they murdered 20 million Russians.
1935 – China disarmed its citizens, and between 1948 – 1952 they murdered 20 million Chinese.
1938 – Germany disarmed its citizens, and between 1939 – 1945 they murdered 16 million Jews.
1956 – Cambodia disarmed its citizens, and between 1975 – 1977 they murdered 1 million Educated people.
1964 – Guatemala disarmed its citizens, and between 1964 – 1981 they murdered 100,000 Mayan Indians.
1970 – Uganda disarmed its citizens, and between 1971 – 1979 they murdered 300,000 Christians.
Attorneys should be seeing huge dollar signs this Christmas! If I were a gun owner in NYS and just had my name and address posted as a gun owner, Id be suing the living daylights out of these people for endangering myself, my family, and making me a target for potential thieves! I see a class action lawsuit from New Yorks legal gun owners!
I call upon Anonymous to take down these people who would dare use an Anon tactic like this to undermine the Constitution.
The liberals are setting up gun owners for conflict with non-gun owners. Also, my 87 year old Mother is on that list. I am so worried. Criminals now know where to get at least one gun free that can’t be traced back to them. Terrible heartless liberals. This is liberalism today. Attacking law abiding citizens – treating them like they are sex offenders. They should have just had the dots. Why in hell give the name and address of people who are obeying the law!!! Reckless beyond belief. We are waiting the a class action so we can jump in!
You people really need to sue that paper and cancel asap…
Writer of this article who published all these names:
Dwight R. Worley
23006 139 Ave
Springfield Gardens, NY 11413
(718) 527-0832
Tax Watch Reporter at the Journal News/LoHud.com
“Journal News reporter Dwight R. Worley owns a Smith & Wesson 686 .357 Magnum and has had a residence permit in New York City for that weapon since February 2011.”
Yes. Lawsuit by each gun owner against the news bureau AND by each non-gun owner against the news bureau for exposing their home to vulnerability. Then a class action lawsuit for putting all those neighborhoods in jeopardy – that one should be brought on by the Police, Fire and Aid Departments, because now they have a lot more to deal with.
From a poster on the Examiner…….Alright New Yorkers, here ya go. Have fun with THIS list of names, addresses, and phone numbers. This is the list of the morons responsable for the publication.Journal News President: Janet Hasson, 3 Gate House Lane Mamaroneck, NY 10534 (914) 694.5204 Editors: Cyndee Royle, 1133 Westchester Ave., Suite N110, White Plains, NY 10604, 914-694-9300 Nancy Cutler 9 Woodwind Ln, Spring Valley, NY. (845) 354 3485 Parent company of The Journal News Gannett CEO Gracia C Martore 728 Springvale Rd Great Falls, VA 22066 (703) 759 5954 The reporter on the story is Dwight R Worley 23006 139 Ave Springfield Gardens, NY 11413 (718) 527 0832.
[...] AMI Global Security reports yet another Gannett newspaper, the “Journal News” has printed a list of all concealed weapons permit holders in Rockland and Westchester Counties of New York State. [...]
This is not public record, it’s a list (my dad used to say) that when the time comes, they can come door to door to collect the gun you registered.
Interesting reading, but please, which paper printed this list? I would like to see it.
New York Journal news. I have all the information for the people responsible but i was trying to verify before posting. This is what i have found.
Editors of The Journal News are
Janet Hasson, 3 Gate House Rd, Mamaroneck, NY 10534. (248) 594-2197
Cyndee Royle, 1133 Westchester Ave., Suite N110, White Plains, NY 10604, 914-694-9300
Nancy Cutler 9 Woodwind Ln, Spring Valley, NY. (845) 354 3485
The CEO of the parent company is
Gannett CEO
Gracia C Martore
728 Springvale Rd
Great Falls, VA 22066
(703) 759 5954
The reporter on the story is
Dwight R Worley
23006 139 Ave
Springfield Gardens, NY 11413 (718) 527 0832
Editors of The Journal News are
Janet Hasson, 3 Gate House Rd, Mamaroneck, NY 10534. (248) 594-2197
Cyndee Royle, 1133 Westchester Ave., Suite N110, White Plains, NY 10604, 914-694-9300
Nancy Cutler 9 Woodwind Ln, Spring Valley, NY. (845) 354 3485
The CEO of the parent company is
Gannett CEO
Gracia C Martore
728 Springvale Rd
Great Falls, VA 22066
(703) 759 5954
The reporter on the story is
Dwight R Worley
23006 139 Ave
Springfield Gardens, NY 11413 (718) 527 0832
Anyone able to verify this?
Wow! GOOD MOVE GOVERNMENT AND MEDIA! Let’s show all the bad guys! There isn’t a thimble full of brains between the 2 of you!
I have been saying for years there is no crime for not entering any state or federal database, read the statue very close….
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers,
and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be
violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause,
supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place
to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Amendment XIII
Section 1.
Neither
slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime
whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the
United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
Section 2.
Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
United States v. Graham, 11-0094, LEXIS 26954 (D. Md. Mar. 1, 2012), was a Maryland District Court case in which the Court held that historical cell site location data is not protected by the Fourth Amendment. Reacting to precedent established by the recent Supreme Court case United States v. Antoine Jones in conjunction with the application of the third party doctrine, Judge Richard D. Bennett,
found that “information voluntarily disclosed to a third party ceases
to enjoy Fourth Amendment protection” because that information no longer
belongs to the consumer, but rather to the telecommunications company
that handles the transmissions records.[1]
The historical cell site location data is then not subject to the
privacy protections afforded by the Fourth Amendment standard of probable cause, but rather to the Stored Communications Act, which governs the voluntary or compelled disclosure of stored electronic communications records.
Are Historical Cell-Site Data Protected Under the Fourth Amendment After United States v. Jones?
Orin Kerr • March 4, 2012 4:33 pm
No, concludes Judge Bennett in United States v. Graham (District of Maryland, March 1, 2012). Judge Bennett concludes that historical cell-site records are not protected because they fall under the third-party doctrine:
Like the bank records at issue in [United States v.]
Miller, the historical cell site location records in this case are not
the ‘private papers’ of the Defendants—instead, they are the ‘business
records’ of the cellular providers. Federal law does not mandate that
cellular providers create or maintain this type of data,11 and even
courts that have concluded that government acquisition of cumulative
cell site location records can violate the Fourth Amendment generally
acknowledge that these records are ‘generated in the ordinary course of
the provider‘s business.’ In re Application of the United States, 747 F.
Supp. 2d 827, 841 (S.D. Tex. 2010) (Smith, Mag. J.), appeal docketed,
No. 11-20554 (5th Cir. Dec. 14, 2011). Moreover, insofar as historical
cell site records are created and maintained by the cellular providers,
individual customers do not generally have access to those records, and
could not be expected to produce them in response to a subpoena. Under
the reasoning of Miller, therefore, historical cell site location
records are the provider‘s business records, and are not protected by
the Fourth Amendment.
Based on clear Supreme Court and Fourth Circuit precedent, this Court
finds the third-party doctrine applicable to historical cell site
location information. Like the bank records at issue in Miller, the
telephone numbers dialed in Smith, and the subscriber information
collected in Bynum, historical cell site location records are records
created and kept by third parties that are voluntarily conveyed to those
third parties by their customers. As part of the ordinary course of
business, cellular phone companies collect information that identifies
the cellular towers through which a person‘s calls are routed.
[...] outrage is expressed on Godlike Productions and The Blaze. AMI Global Security also published an article condemning the massive privacy breach which they said is meant to intimidate the lawful and abrogate the Bill of [...]
[...] Journal News (White Plains, NY) yesterday published and mapped all the gun owners in Westchester and Rockland Counties in New York’s Lower Hudson Valley. [...]
Somebody needs their ass kicked.
I think we need to know the addresses of all the news reporters andwho made this story possible. Oh yeah let see their relatives addresses also … all’s fair right?
While there is no doubt that this was meant to be intimidation for the gun owners, but think about it… Who is more likely NOT to get mugged or robbed. YEP! That’s right! All the gun owners.
NOW… Take a guess at all who have just been made easy targets… YEP! That’s right!! All those whose names weren’t published.
NOW… who do you think should be more pissed off: Gun Owners or NON-Gun Owners??
At least before criminals wanting to perpetrate a crime had a 50/50 chance that you might be a gun owner and they could get shot… Now, thanks to the newpapers, they have just made targets for all those who don’t own a gun.
Think about this with me… Why did the “gunmen” choose schools??? Because they knew they were “GUN FREE ZONES” The newspaper just let everyone know where all the “GUN FREE ZONES” are by virtue of NOT listing them in the newpaper.
This is a very stupid thing for a newspaper to do. Now criminals will know which homes to break into so that they can acquire firearms illegally.
A massive campaign of letter writing to the advertisers ought to take care of LOHUD and should shut these clowns down pretty fast. If it doesn’t then we hit the pocket books of every advertiser that donates to their cause. Words mean nothing. Non-violent reaction via their wallets screams volumes. AND SPREAD THE WORD.
Here is the home phone number and address of one of the executive editors if anyone feels like calling her or writing her a letter…
Cynthia R Lambert
17 Mcbride Ave
White Plains, NY 10603
[...] it “outrageous” and linked to an embarrassingly unintelligent piece from AMI Global Security, a guns and ammo seller, which calls the publication “a massive privacy breach and the latest [...]
[...] it “outrageous” and linked to an embarrassingly unintelligent piece from AMI Global Security, a guns and ammo seller, which calls the publication “a massive privacy breach and the latest [...]
[...] blogger Instapundit suggested it’s a breach of privacy. AMI Global Security, a gun dealer, said it was “appalled and alarmed at this abuse of power” by the [...]
Massive lawsuit is the word!
[...] “The gun -owner has an added responsibility to take all measures that their firearms do not fall into the hands of such miscreants. Beside the natural precautions, they cannot permit themselves to fall hostage in trade for access to their firearms locks.” [...]
Dwight R. Worley, man who published all the permit holders.
23006 139 Ave
Springfield Gardens, NY 11413
(718) 527-0832
He loves to breach privacy…so here’s a taste of his own medicine.
Let us go through the list and locate the ones who are on their side.
After going through the list and determining who is a leftist, then thrust this knowledge out into the open against them. It is obvious that they will eat their own.
This is not a game they are playing people. These people who are doing these things mean for deaths to occur.
Public record is public record. If I buy a home, everyone knows where I live. When I licence my dogs, everyone knows I own them. Should I ever choose to own a gun, I would expect that would be public as well. ANYTHING that can affect public interests or safety has the right to be public knowledge. I am deeply saddened that this post will not get me invited to your “tea party” but the simple fact remains that your right to bear arms was not violated. Just order a home security system and keep your guns in a safe.
How about publishing the name and address of the editor and chief?
From the Journal News comments section; addresses of some of the brass and the reporter on the story.
Let’s turn the tables on the Journal and see how they like it!
Journal News President:
—Janet Hasson, 3 Gate House Lane Mamaroneck, NY 10534 (914) 694.5204
Editors:
—Cyndee Royle, 1133 Westchester Ave., Suite N110, White Plains, NY 10604, 914-694-9300
–Nancy Cutler 9 Woodwind Ln, Spring Valley, NY. (845) 354 3485
Parent company of The Journal News Gannett
—–CEO Gracia C Martore 728 Springvale Rd Great Falls, VA 22066 (703) 759 5954
The reporter on the story is:
–Dwight R Worley 23006 139 Ave Springfield Gardens, NY 11413 (718) 527 0832
Copy and re-post this. Don’t let it get buried! Save a copy for when they re-set the comments.
The robbers and rapists now know what homes and families to avoid.
The change in shooting statistics will be interesting. I’ll bet 6 months from now it will be close to 95% of the armed attacks will be against unarmed and unprotected citizens and their homes.
Their plan to hurt gun owners will backfire on them when the statistics are finally seen.
Let’s turn the tables on the Journal and see how they like it!
Journal News President:
—Janet Hasson, 3 Gate House Lane Mamaroneck, NY 10534 (914) 694.5204
Editors:
—Cyndee Royle, 1133 Westchester Ave., Suite N110, White Plains, NY 10604, 914-694-9300
–Nancy Cutler 9 Woodwind Ln, Spring Valley, NY. (845) 354 3485
Parent company of The Journal News Gannett
—–CEO Gracia C Martore 728 Springvale Rd Great Falls, VA 22066 (703) 759 5954
The reporter on the story is:
–Dwight R Worley 23006 139 Ave Springfield Gardens, NY 11413 (718) 527 0832
The gun grabbers want us to register our guns and yet will not protect the records. And they claim to not understand why we don’t want to register our guns. We could never leave them home.
could the paper be sued for this breach of privacy and putting law abiding citizens in harms way? if i lived in that area, i’d either be seeking a law suit agains the paper, or i’d be wondering how to get away with burning their building down!
[...] blogger Instapundit suggested it’s a breach of privacy. AMI Global Security, a gun dealer, said it was “appalled and alarmed at this abuse of power” by the [...]
Leave the tea party out of it and more people will show up.
BREAKING: Pistol Clerks in New York refuse to release Permit Holders information to Journal News: http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/news/General+News/150779/Journal-News-Doesnt-Stop:-Putnam-County-Denies-Them-Identities-Of-Gun-Permit-Holders.html
In the 1960′s anti-whites forced ALL and ONLY white countries to open their borders to non-white immigration. Then anti-whites forced ALL and ONLY white people to “integrate” or face penalties for being “naziswhowanttokill6millionjews.” Now anti-whites are calculating and celebrating ALL and ONLY white children becoming minorities and extinct EVERYWHERE. It’s Genocide. “Anti-racist” is a codeword for anti-white.
“This is a invasion of privacy that does nothing to safeguard the law abiding from the criminal element. One barking dog can herd a thousand sheep to be sheared. This appears to be an attempt to abrogate the Bill of Rights. If Paul Revere had the internet , he would not have needed a horse . Please share this with all of your fellow Americans who are alarmed by a government encroachment, aided and abetted by propagandist masquerading as objective journalist.
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH! If you are appalled and alarmed at this abuse of power:
The best response to the gun grabbing agenda driven is for Americans nation-wide to purchase a firearm today!
I am calling on all Americans, Constitutionalists, Tea Party Patriots and 2nd Amendment Activists, to make their voices heard in NY and around the country immediately. The New York City Council just published a report recommending blatant infringements and restraints on the Bill of Rights!!
Contact the Editors at LOHUD.COM and cancel your subscription and let their advertisers know how you feel about it. This is the power of the 1st Amendment in your hands that empowers you to preserve the safeguard afforded us by the 2nd Amendment to the Bill of Rights.” ~ Tony Mele [23 Dec. 2012- AMI GLOBAL SECURITY BLOG ]
[...] time there was a break in/robbery in their community. Yet another coincidence after the liberal Journal News outed law abiding citizens and published their addresses and the guns they owned and put them in harms [...]
… [Trackback]…
[...] Read More: amiglobalsecurity.com/breaking-ny-paper-publishes-gun-permit-holders-names-in-print-online/ [...]…
[...] to see who received a legal permit to own a hand gun license listed by name and address. MORE:BREAKING – EXCLUSIVE: NY Paper Publishes Legal Gun Permit Holders Names in Print & Online! THIS EVENT IS CURRENTLY BEING ORGANIZED. PLEASE STAY TUNED AND INVITE OTHERS FOR NOW. MAILING [...]